Performance and user-friendliness of the rapid antigen detection tests QuickVue Dipstick Strep A test and DIAQUICK Strep A Blue Dipstick for pharyngotonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes in primary health care.

Sensitivity and specificity of rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for detection of group A hemolytic streptococcus (GAS) vary. The purpose is to present the first SKUP (Scandinavian evaluation of laboratory equipment for point of care testing) evaluations concerning the assessment of the diagnostic performance and user-friendliness of two RADTs for detection of GAS when used under real-life conditions in primary health care. Throat samples were collected in duplicates at primary health care centers (PHCCs) from patients with symptoms of pharyngitis. The performance of QuickVue Dipstick Strep A test (307 samples) and DIAQUICK Strep A Blue Dipstick (348 samples) was evaluated using culture results at a clinical microbiology laboratory as comparison. The user-friendliness was evaluated using a questionnaire. The diagnostic sensitivity was 92% (90% confidence interval (CI) 87-96%) and 72% (90% CI 65-79%), while the diagnostic specificity was 86% (90% CI 81-90%) and 98% (90% CI 96-99%) for QuickVue Dipstick Strep A test and DIAQUICK Strep A Blue Dipstick, respectively. Both RADTs obtained acceptable assessments for user-friendliness and fulfilled SKUP's quality goal for user-friendliness. The diagnostic sensitivity for QuickVue Dipstick Strep A test and the diagnostic specificity for DIAQUICK Strep A Blue Dipstick in this objective and supplier-independent evaluation were higher compared with previous meta-analyses of RADTs. However, the diagnostic specificity for QuickVue Dipstick Strep A test and the diagnostic sensitivity for DIAQUICK Strep A Blue Dipstick were lower compared with previous meta-analyses of RADTs.

Lower creatinine concentration values and lower inter-laboratory variation among Swedish hospital laboratories in 2014 compared to 1996: results from the Equalis external quality assessment program.

Background Creatinine measurement for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a frequently used laboratory test. Differences in analytic creatinine methods have caused large inter-laboratory variation. International and national standardization efforts have been made in the last decade. Methods This study describes the results of the standardization efforts in Sweden by summarizing data for creatinine concentration in blood plasma in the Equalis quality assessment program during 1996-2014. Results Non-compensated Jaffe methods dominated in 1996-2001 (91 of 103 laboratories; 90%) and were then gradually replaced by either compensated Jaffe methods or enzymatic creatinine methods. In 2014 a majority of Swedish hospital laboratories (139 of 159; 87%) used enzymatic methods. The reported mean creatinine value by the Swedish laboratories was about 10 µmol/L higher than the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) assured reference value in 2003, but consistent with the reference value from 2009 to 2014. The inter-laboratory CV was 7%-9% for creatinine values until 2007, and thereafter gradually decreased to about 4%-5% in 2014. Conclusions The introduction of enzymatic methods in Swedish laboratories has contributed to achieving a low inter-laboratory variation. Also, the reported values are lower for enzymatic methods compared to Jaffe methods, and the values obtained with enzymatic methods were consistent with IDMS certified values established at reference laboratories. Thus, many Swedish hospital laboratories reported 10 µmol/L lower, and more true, creatinine concentrations in 2012 than in 2003, which may cause bias in longitudinal studies.

Evaluation of coagulation assays versus LC-MS/MS for determinations of dabigatran concentrations in plasma.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor for which routine laboratory monitoring is currently not recommended. However, there are situations in which measurements of the drug and its effect are desirable. We therefore compared and validated different coagulation methods for assessments of dabigatran in clinical samples in relation to measurements of plasma dabigatran, without the purpose of establishing effective and safe concentrations of dabigatran in plasma. METHODS: Samples were obtained from 70 atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran etexilate. Plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and were compared with coagulation methods Hemoclot thrombin inhibitors (HTI) and Ecarin clotting assay (ECA), as well as with prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). RESULTS: A wide range of dabigatran concentrations was determined by LC-MS/MS (<0.5-586 ng/mL). Correlations between LC-MS/MS results and estimated concentrations were excellent for both HTI and ECA overall (r(2) = 0.97 and 0.96 respectively, p < 0.0001), but the precision and variability of these assays were not fully satisfactory in the low range of dabigatran plasma concentrations, in which ECA performed better than HTI. aPTT performed poorly, and was normal (<40 s) even with dabigatran levels of 60 ng/mL. PT-INR was normal even at supratherapeutic dabigatran concentrations. CONCLUSION: LC-MS/MS is the gold standard for measurements of dabigatran in plasma. Alternatively, either HTI or ECA assays may be used, but neither of these assays is dependable when monitoring low levels or to infer total absence of dabigatran. The aPTT assay is relatively insensitive to dabigatran, and normal aPTT results may be observed even with therapeutic dabigatran concentrations.